The Law.

-THE LAW-

Within this section I do set forth the Federal statutes (laws) which are relevant to my allegations of "Employment Discrimination", "Employment Retaliation", "Defamation of Character", "Conspiracy to obstruct justice", and "Conspiracy to violate an individual´s most basic rights as protected by International Treaties and by U.S Laws". In other words, I do provide access to the reader to those statutes which create jurisdiction for the claims I brought up before the Federal District Courts as it relates to the deprivation of my Civil Rights within the United States at the hands of government officials, and some previous employers alike. It is very important to mention at this point that the Conspiracy at issue has been ongoing over four (4) decades. (40+ years)

Additionally, I do set forth the main "Constitutional Amendments" within the Bill of rights of the U.S Constitution which are relevant to my claims of civil rights' violations. In particular, I am referring to the I, V, VI, VIII, and XIV Amendments. The good understanding of these "Laws and Amendments" is critical so that the reader can infer that in the United States of America rights such as those to: "Due Process of Law", "Fair Trial", and "Equal Protection of the Laws" are inalienable, and sacred rights, that no legislature at the State or Federal levels can tamper with. In fact, any attempt to enact laws infringing the rights mentioned within the "Bill of Rights" has traditionally been met with rejection by the U.S Supreme Court.

Thus, any "Strict liability" laws intending to supress any of those rights are without a doubt unconstitutional, illegal, and in some cases are also Defamatory per se since, for instance, accusing and convicting an adult of being a "child rapist" is just plain illegal and inmoral when the legal facts are well known as to show that the adult was indeed victimized by a "Juvenile Delinquent", and not the other way around. That was my case in the state of Texas during the year of 2001 in which the evidence clearly shows that an act in furtherance of the conspiracy at issue took place against me.

At that time, two (2) "Female Juvenile Delinquents" apparently encouraged by adults (most likely government agents) approached me the night of Saturday, April 27 of 2001, pretending to be "Adult Hookers" looking for a good time. Notwithstanding the fact that these two juveniles admitted lying to me about their identities and stole as well an automobile from me, during the summer of the year of 2001 I was accused and later convicted in the state of Texas under a Strict Liability Law of the so called Agravated Sexual Assault of a Child.

This was done regardless of the fact that U.S Government Agencies such as the "F.B.I", and the "N.S.A" (among others) had me under surveillance for years and knew each and every one of the details surrounding the events of such evening. Meaning of course, that I was totally innocent of the Texas´ charges, and that the so called "Children" had approached me seeking sexual intercourse while pretending to be consenting adults. This fact was also acknowledged by the alleged victim´s best friend after being apprehended for stealing my automobile, and later on during the trial itself. In fact, even the alleged victim did confess to the police, and during the trial of his matter that she had lied to me about her age, that she had not been raped, and that she had instigated the sexual encounter because they needed money to get high.

There is a reason why the U.S Constitution calls these Amendments "Basic Rights" and not "Privileges". The most elemental principle behind it is that absolutely No One, not even the President of the United States has the legal authority to tamper with such rights in any manner and under any circumstances. Therefore, once we learn that every person in the United States has a constitutional given right to establish an "Affirmative Defense" against any charges or accusations as to be able to prevail on the merits of the evidence; then, it becomes a clear case of Barbarism, of State Supported Terrorism to hear a "Judge" and/or a "District Attorney" instructing a jury that the "Facts of the Case do not Matter," and must be disregarded.

We all have the reponsibility to ensure that the act of "slandering" an individual does not become something "Legal," and/or acceptable in the United States because as previously stated it is very clear that such behaviour is in "total conflict" with the provisions of the Federal Constitution.

The Federal Statute 28 U.S.C §1981 states as follows:

EQUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW:

"(a) Statement of equal rights: All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other".

The Federal Statute 42 U.S.C §2000e-2(a)(1) states as follows:

UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES:

SEC. 2000e-2. [Section 703]

(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer:
 (1) " To fail, or refuse to hire, or to discharge any individual; or otherwise to discriminate against any
 individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because
 of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."

The Federal Statute 42 U.S.C §2000e-3(a)(1)

States as follows:

EMPLOYMENT RETALIATION:

(a) "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate

 against any of his employees, or applicants for employment,  just because he has

opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this subchapter,

or because he has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner

in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this subchapter".

The Federal Statute 42 U.S.C § 1983 states as follows:

§ 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights:

"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress..."

The Federal Statute 42 U.S.C § 1985(2) states as follows:

§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights:

(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror

"If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict... Or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators..."

FIRST AMENDMENT

(To the United States Constitution)

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".

FIFTH AMENDMENT

(To the U.S. Constitution)

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation".

SIXTH Amendment

(To the U.S. Constitution)

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence".

EIGHTH AMENDMENT

(To the U.S. Constitution)

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted".

FOURTEENTH Amendment

(To the U.S. Constitution)

"Section. 1. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".